NEW YORK (AP) -- U.S. births fell for the fourth year in a row,
the government reported Wednesday, with experts calling it more proof
that the weak economy has continued to dampen enthusiasm for having
children.
But there may be a silver lining:
The decline in 2011 was just 1 percent - not as sharp a fall-off as the 2
to 3 percent drop seen in other recent years.
"It
may be that the effect of the recession is slowly coming to an end,"
said Carl Haub, a senior demographer with the Population Reference
Bureau, a Washington, D.C.-based research organization.
Most
striking in the new report were steep declines in Hispanic birth rates
and a new low in teen births. Hispanics have been disproportionately
affected by the flagging economy, experts say, and teen birth rates have
been falling for 20 years.
Falling births is a
relatively new phenomenon in this country. Births had been on the rise
since the late 1990s and hit an all-time high of more than 4.3 million
in 2007.
But fewer than 4 million births were counted last year - the lowest number since 1998.
Among
the people who study this sort of thing, the flagging economy has been
seen as the primary explanation. The theory is that many women or
couples who are out of work, underemployed or have other money problems
feel they can't afford to start a family or add to it.
The
economy officially was in a recession from December 2007 until June
2009. But well into 2011, polls show most Americans remained gloomy,
citing anemic hiring, a depressed housing market and other factors.
The
report by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is a first
glimpse at 2011 birth certificate data from state health departments.
More analysis comes later but officials don't expect the numbers to
change much.
Early data for 2012 is not yet
available, and it's too soon to guess whether the birth decline will
change, said the CDC's Stephanie Ventura, one of the study's authors.
Highlights of the report include:
-The
birth rate for single women fell for the third straight year, dropping
by 3 percent from 2010 to 2011. The birth rate for married women,
however, rose 1 percent. In most cases, married women are older and more
financially secure.
-The birth rate for
Hispanic women dropped a whopping 6 percent. But it declined only 2
percent for black women, stayed the same for whites and actually rose a
bit for Asian-American and Pacific Islanders.
-Birth
rates fell again for women in their early 20s, down 5 percent from 2010
- the lowest mark for women in that age group since 1940, when
comprehensive national birth records were first compiled. For women in
their late 20s, birth rates fell 1 percent.
-But
birth rates held steady for women in their early 30s, and rose for moms
ages 35 and older. Experts say that's not surprising: Older women
generally have better jobs or financial security, and are more sensitive
to the ticking away of their biological clocks.
-Birth
rates for teen moms have been falling since 1991 and hit another
historic low. The number of teen births last year - about 330,000 - was
the fewest in one year since 1946. The teen birth rate fell 8 percent,
and at 31 per 1,000 girls ages 15 through 19 was the lowest recorded in
more than seven decades.
"The continued
decline in the teen birth rates is astounding," said John Santelli, a
Columbia University professor of population and family health.
Did the economy have anything to do with a drop in teen births?
Yes,
indirectly, Santelli said. Teenagers watch the struggles and decisions
that older sisters and older girlfriends are making, and what they see
influences their thinking about sex and birth control, he said.
"Teens tend to emulate young adults," Santelli said. "They are less influenced directly by the economy than by people."
Studies
show that since 2007, larger percentages of sexually active teenage
girls are using the pill and other effective birth control. Studies also
show a small decline in the proportion of girls ages 15 through 17 who
say they've had sex, Santelli noted.
The new
birth report also noted a fourth straight decline in a calculation of
how many children women have over their lifetimes, based on the birth
rates of a given year.
A rate of a little more
than 2 children per woman means each couple is helping keep the
population stable. The U.S. rate last year was slightly below 1.9.
Countries
with rates close to 1 - such as Japan and Italy - face future labor
shortages and eroding tax bases as they fail to reproduce enough to take
care of their aging elders.
Officials here aren't as worried.
The
U.S. replacement rate is still close to 2. And it has dropped in the
past and then bounced back up again, said Ventura, an official at the
CDC's National Center for Health Statistics.
"And we haven't seen any studies that show couples want to have fewer children or no children," she added.
One
more report highlight: The U.S. C-section rate may have finally peaked
at just under 33 percent, the same level as last year.
Cesarean
deliveries are sometimes medically necessary. But health officials have
worried that many C-sections are done out of convenience or unwarranted
caution, and in the 1980s set a goal of keeping the national rate at 15
percent.
The C-section rate had been rising steadily since 1996, until it dropped slightly in 2010.
"It
does suggest the upward trend may be halted," said Joyce Martin, a CDC
epidemiologist who co-authored the new report. But CDC officials want a
few more years of data before declaring victory, she added.
Copyright 2012 by The Associated Press. All rights reserved.